Moral Hazard

Written by on

Moral Hazard Definition

Moral hazard is a set of circumstances in which one individual or entity has the ability to take a risk because another individual or entity we’ll have to deal with any negative outcomes. Moral hazard specifically refers to the risk that exists when two parties lack equal knowledge of actions taken following an existing agreement. The “moral” in moral hazard refers to the incentive for involved parties to selfishly reject ethical choices in favor of choices that will help them directly.

Origins and Current Usage of the Term “Moral Hazard”

The term itself has its origins in the field of insurance. Today, however, it is discussed in the economic and financial world as well. Moral hazard is often found in the insurance industry, in the lending industry, and in relationships between employers and their employees.

Specific Conditions of Moral Hazard

There are two key elements of the contractual conditions that produce moral hazard:

  1. Asymmetry of information by the two parties involved in the contract: If one of these parties has more information than the other party about a situation that is relevant to the contract, this is considered to be an asymmetry.
  2. The contract has effects on two different entities’ choices: Often, the two agents have differing incentives in the same contract. Insurance is a great example of this, where the insurer has an incentive to lower the risk of damage but the insured may not, and so takes higher risks.

Moral Hazard Examples

There are many diverse examples of moral hazard, but here are some common scenarios:

  • Government bank bail-outs: If governments declare that they will bail out any banks that make losses, banks are emboldened to make more risky decisions because the risk to them is much lower. The same is true of corporations that are considered “ too big to fail”— companies that are likely to receive financial bailouts are financially incentivized to take greater risks of the pursuit of profit.
  • Insurance: If someone who owns property purchase is insurance for this property, their agreement with the insurance provider assumes that the property owner will do their best to prevent damage to send property. However, the moral hazard here lies in the fact that property owner has less of an incentive to care for their property and prevent damage to it: if damage does occur, it is the insurance provider who carries the financial burden, rather than the property owner.
  • The 2008 Financial Crisis: This economic crisis contains multiple examples of moral hazard. First, many homeowners did not hesitate to leave their mortgages, which is a moral hazard that experts mostly failed to predict. Second, many lenders used incentives like commissions to encourage mortgage brokers to make as many loans as they could, without vetting borrowers’ ability to pay back said loans. They would then be sold to investors, who would end up burdened with these high-risk loans.
  • Employees and employers: Employees are less incentivized to care for goods and supplies (such as company cars) that are owned by the employer. Employees may thus take greater risks and put less effort into these goods’ maintenance.
Prateek Agarwal
Prateek Agarwal
Member since June 20, 2011
Prateek Agarwal’s passion for economics began during his undergrad career at USC, where he studied economics and business. He started Intelligent Economist in 2011 as a way of teaching current and fellow students about the intricacies of the subject. Since then he has researched the field extensively and has published over 200 articles. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please email me or connect with me on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/prateekgrwl/

Leave a Comment